More
about Volunteer Quality
Of all the topics relevant
to Quality, in my opinion, the singlemost relevant issue is the role of Voluntary
Quality.
As a rule, we humans are
best characterized as procrastinators with, of course the best of intentions, but
woefully short attention span. Given the
opportunity to do something right (the first time) we generally would like to
comply, but then we become distracted and more times than not don’t actually
get around to following through. It’s
not that we are an evil or slothful species, we are however, well intentioned,
but easily sidetracked with some occasional shining moments. There are some who might resent my
characterization, but with regret, history and the wealth of evidence are on my
side.
Many of us over time have
tried to keep the ship going in the right direction by building systems and
circumstance (police, government and laws, rules, teachers, mothers, standards and
Quality Management) to overcome our inherent nature. It seems that with an aggressive oversight we
will tend towards more success. In the
presence of the watchful eye, we are more likely to do the “right thing”.
In my own situation, I
personally tend to complicate myself and those around me with push-back,
especially if I think the oversight rules, laws, conventions and pressures are
artificial and arbitrary. I always
have. To this day I rarely wear a
seatbelt, and generally I consider speed-limits more as guidelines. (But I digress). That being said, if I know, understand and
respect oversight, odds are that I will be a lot more diligent.
And that brings me to the
essence of this posting.
Recently I have been looking
at what it takes for me to participate and commit to a set of standards that can provide insight and guidance within the domain of Quality.
Clearly we are committed to Quality, but we are just like the rest of
our species; the chances of our becoming engaged in a system in which we don’t
know and understand and respect the rules, and further don’t know and
understand and respect the oversight body, then we will likely not
follow-through. We would likely fail to
take the document seriously and would in all probability lose interest quickly.
We are not alone. Consider that 75 percent of certifications to
ISO 9001 fall apart or fail. For many of
the 75 percent who fail, investigation and study indicates there are internal
barriers that account for the failure, but I also wonder to what degree the
organizations’ respect for their assessment bodies played a role.
Fortunately for us we are
part of the remaining 25 percent who continue to be successful after 10 years
of participation. We know and understand
and respect what ISO9001:2008 can bring to our table.
Recently I have been on the lookout of a new standard to supplement our Quality Management system requirements. We became interested, indeed intrigued with
one, which will remain nameless.
Unfortunately after a lot of
investigation and discussion we now understand that the document was written by
a process that as best as I can tell without regard to community or consensus
or validation, and is written by a group that distains oversight of its own
process. Interesting when I had a
thorough conversation with them about consensus and external validation as
components of standards development, their response was “We are not accredited
and we don’t have to do any of those things”.
I know what they are doing, and I understand
what they are doing, but it is very difficult for me to find that essential
third requirement of respect. The
chances of our having any on-going success would be very limited. Having a successful first assessment would be
a “no-brainer” and I guess we could notch that into our belt as an
accomplishment, but the likelihood of sustained follow-through (the true
achievement) just wouldn’t happen.
The search continues.
PS: Recently I learned the
hard way what happens when you don’t wear a seat belt. You get a heavy fine.
PPS: Looking forward to a positive and successful 2014
I think the real heavy fine you pay for not wearing a seatbelt is to lose your internal organ structure due to the force of impact.
ReplyDeleteInteresting perspective on commitment and why we fight it.