I spend a lot of time looking for new
and interesting books to expand my Quality library. There are tons of books available, but a lot
of them have that “been-there and done-that” feel and content. Every once in a while I find a pearl that
makes it worthwhile for me to keep going.
This week I went to Amazon and found a
2006 little book (113 pages) entitled Take
a Quality Ride: The Realities of Implementing A Quality Management System
written by Susan Marie Hinkle. It is a
real gem, and even though it is now 6 years old, I find that it still holds up
as a must read.
Susan Hinkle is a Quality Professional
with a lot of experience implementing and maintaining Quality systems in a
variety of industries (not health care).
She has written this book, not to compete with Joseph Juran or Phillip
Crosby or W. Edwards Deming, but to point out some valuable insights based on
her experiences. I like this approach,
in large part because her experiences are a lot like mine, and I think really
valuable for the organization that is thinking about implementing a program for
the first time. I suspect that there may
also be some organizations that have tried to implement but failed, who might
be interested in reading that they are not alone in their failure. It might give them reason to try again, being
more aware of the pitfalls that are very common.
She raises a number of key points such
as the importance of doing Gap Analysis.
I used to see this all the time;
organizations thinking that they can save some money by skipping a Gap Analysis
before they get the certification body or accreditation body involved. This is rarely a good idea, and defeats the
notion of organizational learning through improvement of gaps and errors. I have mentioned before the real value of
bringing in an outside person to help with this step (the so-called External –
Internal audit.
Another point she makes is about the
real power of the voluntary certification or accreditation. Susan makes the point that given a choice the
organization should find the best fit assessor (It is not necessarily wise to choose the lowest priced certification
body or appraiser. Remember the
certification auditor or lead appraiser is there to find out what is working
well and encourage you to get certified or rated, not to punish you for things
you have not done, so it is in your own interest to find a competent
certification body or appraiser.) I
suspect that these days she might extend this further to reinforce that this
optimum assessor is the one that best fits your needs. Just as the cheapest is often not the best
choice, neither should the most expensive be the best option, and similarly a
cautious look should be taken before on takes on a assessment just because it
is from another country. Often local is
best because the assessors know the language and know local conditions. The key issue is to actively decide on whom
to use as the assessor.
I also like her point about those
annoying experts who extend unsolicited advice or suggestions that are rarely
useful. Expect the “experts” to come out
of the woodwork, but do not let them get in the way of your implementation
project or get you down.
One point were we might disagree is
where Susan talks about thinking about Costs of Quality mainly in money
terms. This was really an older concept
which ignores the impacts of consumption of time and effort and energy that not
are the consequence of error but important causation or perpetuation factors
(TEEM). I suspect up reflection that she
would consider this as a better scale for measuring costs.
So, from my perspective, Take a
Quality Ride is still a fast easy read and a great book. It is well worth the money you would pay for
a paper copy (less than $20). Buying an
electronic copy is almost like getting it for free, but in this situation the old
adage of “you get what you pay for” does NOT apply.
I am interested in others’ opinions
(including Ms.Hinkle’s) on this or any other book gem out there.
Thank you for your positive review and insights with regard to my book. When I wrote it, it was for a rather "niche" audience and I am happy to see that professionals like yourself in other industries have found value in it.
ReplyDeleteSince writing this book 6 years ago, I have continued to develop and learn specifically in the field of Project Quality which differs from implementing a QMS. Who knows...maybe my next venture into writing will be addressing that!
Thanks again. Your insight is well received and much appreciated.
Susan
Hie laboratorians out there, Im in a setting where quality has gone ahead in areas of chem,haemo and immuno but micro keeps lagging behind. Any ideas on quality issues in Micro. Anyone with ideas on Microbiology method validation protocols. What aspect they shd cover?
ReplyDelete