In the previous parts of
this series I have addressed that education theorists have long ago determined
that adult learners are different. When
it comes to learning, the adage “adults are just big children” does not
apply. Andragogy is the theory (science?)
of mentoring adults is not the same as pedagogy (mentoring children). The challenge and message to us is that if
we want to mentor our adult co-workers about Quality Management in the
workplace then we are well advised to use the mentoring and teaching skills
that work best for adults.
The problem is that most of
us (a) are busy learning ourselves about quality (b) have never sought out
training as teacher/mentors and (c) don’t know, indeed have probably never
heard words like andragogy or pedagogy.
The best we have to go on is our past experience as learners, which was
unfortunately mostly during the time of our own childhood and adolescence which
usually means standing in front of the group, usually with a PowerPoint file
and drone on, point after point, for 40 minutes and then ask if anyone has any
questions. And then wonder why most
wander out, no questions asked, and usually no information absorbed.
Adults like to learn what
they want, when they want, and are very specific in their expectations. Adults highly value their own experiences and
usually like to share them, and importantly prefer learning by asking their own
questions rather than by being pumped by others. And if it isn’t working they move on.
We also have another problem;
many of us work in organizations like to talk about continuing education, but
rarely like to support it with time or money or resources or even top
management engagement.
So many of us step up to the
plate with two strikes against us before we even get started; we don’t really
know what we are supposed to do, and tend not to have the money or resources
that we think we need.
So with that sort of an ugly
start, let me share some ideas that will allow you to mentor Quality more
effectively. That way when you do get
some money, you can save it up for a bigger ticket item, like supporting a
special speaker, or sending someone to a Quality conference, or perhaps
subsidizing a person taking a course. Some
of these come from Roberta Silfen’s book Teaching the Adult Learner; others
are mine from my own experience.
First off, avoid the
turn-offs. Forget the sign-in
sheet. The notion of mandatory training
is a crock. Mandatory education is
something that kids get. And keeping
“numbers of people taught” as a metric is a fool’s joke. The point is not how many bodies were there,
it was how many brains you stimulated. If
you really want to know how successful you were, try have a BRIEF post session
satisfaction questionnaire.
And if you are putting on successful mentoring sessions, the audience will either coalesce into a small core of the focused and interested, or will grow.
Try an “open mike” session
by giving people the opportunity to share their experiences on Quality. A person stands up and tells a Quality story,
and then the audience can ask a few questions about it. In an hour you can get maybe 4 or 5
speakers. You get a chance to understand
what your colleagues think about Quality.
The Quality Manager can introduce the session and perhaps do a summary
at the end and maybe start the questions off, but otherwise keep quiet. This is not your time to speak; it is your
time to listen.
Try an interview
session. Set up two chairs at the front
of the room. You invite perhaps the
laboratory director to participate, and have a Quality interview. What does Quality mean to them? Did they learn Quality through courses, or
was it something that they learned to experience and osmosis? The point is not to pin them to the wall, or
show off how smart you are or to throw in the gotcha question; the point is to
give them the change to engage with the staff on why Quality is important for
your laboratory. Staff might even get a
chance to engage in some of the questions as well.
Try the journal club
approach, where the Quality Manager finds a Quality oriented article or book
(article is better) and share it with the group in advance. You might want to consider, for example,
taking one or two blog entries or a current newspaper article, both of which
might be ideal because they tend to be short.
Someone presents the article and then gives their opinion which might
range from “pearls” to “pin-cushion”, and then open the article to discussion
where folks can relate to their own experience.
Try a lecture, but do it in
an adult fashion. If you have 50 minutes
for a session, don’t lecture for any more than 25. Appoint someone as the question person who
can start off with two or three questions, and then open up to others.
The bottom line is always
the same. Put out the information
towards adult mentoring and learning strengths.
Don’t hog the time. It is not
about you. It is about exposing your
adult staff to new ideas. Keep things
moving, and allow your audience to get engaged, and participate and share.
So, what do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments, thoughts...