Labquality Days: A Quality
Adventure
Over the last while I have
had the opportunity to attend a number of laboratory quality oriented
conferences; Laboratory Quality Confab in San Antonio (held this year in New Orleans), Seeding
Knowledge conference in Jeddah, our own POLQM Laboratory Quality Conference in
Vancouver, and most recently LabQuality Days in Helsinki Finland. Each has been a unique experience and each
equally excellent with its own features.
Of the group, LabQuality
Days has had the longest run; this year was the 43rd holding, going
back to 1973, apparently without a break.
I could be wrong, but that must be the longest run for a medical
laboratory quality oriented conference anywhere in the world.
Apparently over the years
there have been both lean and abundant attendances. This year there were about 500 people split
into two simultaneous sub-conferences, one held in Finnish, and the other in
English. The Helsinki Conference held
the session without any difficulty.
I can’t speak about the
Finnish conference in large part because my facility in Finnish is non-existent. (Apparently I am not
alone. I am told that the only place
where Finnish is spoken is in Finland.)
But I can say that as I walked by their sessions in the main auditorium
it was always full. The international
conference was held in a smaller room for about 200 people and it was always
well attended as well.
The international conference
had a dual theme: Pre-analytics and Point of Care; two topics with a lot of
current interest, obviously with widespread appeal. The speakers were widely distributed from
Canada (me), Australia, and an array from across Europe including Norway,
Denmark, Germany, Portugal, Lithuania, UK, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Apparently that was only a small subset of the total group distribution;
in total there were folks from 26 different countries.
I probably shouldn’t speak for others, but I
leaned tons, and was really happy that I had attended.
The meeting was started by
the keynote speaker Bruce Oreck (a former American Ambassador to Finland) who
talked about the state of highly disruptive change that is impacting business
in general and by inference the medical laboratory. Bruce is not the first speaker to raise the
topic, but certainly was very effective.
To my mind, the person from
who I learned the most was Anne Stavelin, from the EQA/PT program in Norway
(NOKLUS) who was very much in the disruptive mode herself. Norway was recognized that the primary user
of Point of Care tests is NOT the hospital laboratory or emergency department,
but is the family docs in the community, and also recognizes that they also
have an obligation to be competent and deserve the opportunity to learn through
quality assessment. Astoundingly in a
country of 5 million people, NOKLUS has almost 5 thousand clients participating
in EQA associated with POCT. For the arithmetically
challenged, that means that close to one out of every 1000 people (0.1percent) living
in Norway is involved in quality assessment.
The mind boggles.
For the anatomic pathology
folks Pedro Soares de Oliveira from Portugal was pretty disruptive as well as
he talked about how much the preparation of glass slide samples for pathology
analysis continues to be an “art “ rather than a “science” still dependent on
touch and feeling rather than precision and standardization. I wonder how one would calculate the
measurement uncertainty of the impact of sample reading and interpretation and
diagnosis. Clearly the times, they are a-changing
very soon
I am really happy that I
have had the opportunity to be introduced to this meeting. Better late than never. This will not be a one-off attendance.
A warning to folks not living
in northern climes; the weather is not nice, but the hospitality and meeting and greeting and learning opportunities
abound and far out way the inconveniences of some rain, or snow and cold.
PS: We will be continuing to host our POLQM Medical Laboratory Quality Conferences in October in Vancouver. I am not sure that we will hold 43 conferences under my management, but maybe with my successor?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments, thoughts...