One of the advantages of attending
conferences is all that empty time that occurs while sitting on the airplane on
the way home. I know that many people
would not see that as a plus, but this is one of the few moments in time when
your mind is set into motion having absorbed all sorts of information – some new,
novel and excellent, some maybe not so much.
There have been conversations, again some routine, but others very intriguing
and stimulating. And now you find yourself on the airplane,
usually alone, contemplating and reviewing and contextualizing.
That opportunity rarely
comes along, except in the situation as described.
On this occasion I was
returning home after attending the Labquality Conference in Helsinki for two
days, and was now spending what was feeling almost as long sitting in airports
and airplanes waiting to get home.
The conference was
excellent; interesting people, interesting topics, interesting ideas. Much more on this later.
The two themes of the
conference were Pre-Analytics and Point of Care Testing. (Personally, I think the term Pre-analytics is incorrect; the correct term would be Pre-Examination. That being said, I agree that pre-analytics is easier to say and easier to write.) This was not particularly surprising because these
have become very hot topics in the medical laboratory arena over the last few
years, with Quality folk interested in both, each in its own distinctive
way. The two topics were presented on
sequential days to pretty much the same audience. As much as they are very different topics,
they felt they were kinda-sorta related.
So I came up with a way to
formally put them together.
During the “Pre-analytics”
portion of the conference, every presenter, including myself came up with a
slide that showed a version the Total Testing Cycle or the Laboratory Testing
Cycle. You know what I am talking
about: It goes from the Patient to the
Pre-Pre-Examination Phase to the Pre-Examination Phase to the Examination Phase
and on to the Post-Examination and Post-Post Examination phases and then back
to the Patient. I think of this as a
linear horizontal pathway.
It works, but focuses on one
aspect of the laboratory activity, specifically the testing process. But it
leaves out a lot of other stuff that is equally important; laboratory Quality,
laboratory Safety, laboratory Communications.
So I have put together
another schema, this based on a core, a
layer of activities that holds the core together and intact, and related
activities that occur outside and separate from the laboratory. I think of the layers as:
The laboratory core: the central activity of laboratory
testing. It is the laboratory analysis activity area. This is the testing activity
that occurs within the four walls, the ceiling and the floor of the laboratory
space.
Exo-Analytic Layer: The layer of activities that
sits outside the testing core and serves as providing support and binding. The prefix "exo" means “outside but an
extrinsic part”. Think of this as the exoskeleton
of laboratory activity. This is the
layer that includes Quality, Safety, Communication and Education, plus others.
The Extra-Laboratory Layer: The layer beyond out side the Exoanalytic. The prefix “extra” means outside and separate, but may
be related. This would include
activities that includes transport and legislation issues as well as home and
residential considerations.
These days this schema gives
a way to indicate that Point of Care Testing crosses into all aspects of the
laboratory with a very small component being part of laboratory testing, a
larger amount being part of the exo-analytics, and an even larger part in the
extra-laboratory.
The advantage of this
layered view is that it makes clear that some exo-analytic activities have
important associations with laboratory testing, others have associations with the
outside community, and others have both.
Each has to addressed in its own way.
Over time I will refine the model. Today I think it works; I will see if it
continues.
Important message to self:
the long sit on the airplane can be filled with moments other than Sudoku.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteYes i am totally agreed with this article and i just want say that this article is very nice and very informative article.I will make sure to be reading your blog more. You made a good point but I can't help but wonder, what about the other side? !!!!!!Thanks scientific laboratory glassware exporters
ReplyDelete